Hydriz>	ok
[13:13]	I have to check the pages first

	Glavkos: I would need to take a look at the policy when it was changed
	yes, there was one wiki that changed to CC-BY-SA 3.0
[13:14]	<Glavkos>	ok
	please tell me the procedure and which wiki it was ...

[13:15]	<Hydriz>	hold on
	I am checking...
[13:18]	Sorry, still looking
	I can't remember what it was called

[13:21]	<Glavkos>	Bulgaria 2.5

	<nataly8>	μόνο 3 πύλες έμειναν

	<Glavkos>	but in the bottom of the pages writes 3.0

[13:22]	<Hydriz>	ah ha
	found it
	hu.wikinews.org uses 3.0
	wait, no
	oh, wait
	yes, hu.wikinews.org uses CC-BY 3.0

	<Glavkos>	Bosanski >GNU
[13:23]	ok...thank you

	<Hydriz>	But I don't really know how they did it

	<Glavkos>	how can we change it
	I see a confusion about the licenses

[13:24]	<Hydriz>	hmm

	<Glavkos>	Catala 2.5

	<Hydriz>	I don't know a lot about this, but I am searching for it

	<Glavkos>	Czesky 2.5

[13:25]	why some wikis follow 2.5 and some other do not ?

[13:26]	<Hydriz>	only wikinews uses CC-BY-2.5
	all other Wikimedia projects uses CC-BY-SA-3.0
[13:27]	and, CC-BY-2.5 is the same as CC-BY-3.0
	why do you guys want to change it?

[13:31]	-->|	Dcoetzee (~chatzilla@wikimedia/Dcoetzee) has joined #wikinews-el

	<Hydriz>	Glavkos: My friend here can help you regarding the change in license.

	<Dcoetzee>	Hi all, what's up?

[13:32]	<Glavkos>	hi

	<Hydriz>	They wanted to change from their current CC-BY 2.5 to CC-BY 3.0

	<Glavkos>	Dcoetzee: how are you ?

	<Dcoetzee>	That's... possible, but they should avoid stating that all their content is available under CC-BY 3.0.
	Unless they had an "or later" clause originally.

	<Glavkos>	Hydriz: one member of the Greek community just put it for discussion...

[13:33]	<Hydriz>	Glavkos: Dcoetzee can help you about the copyright
	He is much better than me about this

	<Glavkos>	Hydriz: thank you
	Dcoetzee: I didn't get the point ...

	<Dcoetzee>	Hold on

[13:34]	<Glavkos>	our member argued that he will contribute with the 3.0 CC-BY license ....

	<Dcoetzee>	Glavkos: When you edit a page right now on #wikinews-el, what does the copyright agreement the editor agrees to say? Translate it for me.
[13:35]	*on el.wikinews I mean.

	<Glavkos>	ok

[13:36]	All the contribs to Wikinews are regarded that
	they are released under the CC-BY 2.5
[13:37]	and then the disclaimer

	<Dcoetzee>	Okay. It's totally okay to change from CC-BY 2.5 to CC-BY 3.0, but you should realise that your content will be a mixture of 2.5 and 3.0 content.
	I'm not sure what that implies for content reusers.

	<Glavkos>	hmmmm...what is the disadvantage to that ?

[13:38]	<Dcoetzee>	Well all it means is that reusers will have to follow the terms of *both* licenses.

	<Glavkos>	oh

	<Dcoetzee>	Which are pretty much the same.

	<Glavkos>	this gets complicated

	<Dcoetzee>	Yes... but upgrading to 3.0 is a good idea.

[13:39]	-->|	PM|AFK (Pmlinedite@wikimedia/pmlineditor) has joined #wikinews-el
	<--|	PM|AFK has left #wikinews-el

	<Glavkos>	ok , but there is a risk the they will insert content
	from wikipedia

	<Dcoetzee>	Wikipedia is CC-BY-SA 3.0, so it's already incompatible.

[13:40]	<Glavkos>	what is the SA part...pls remind me ...

	<Dcoetzee>	Share Alike. Derivative works must be released under the same license.

	<Glavkos>	oh ...

	<Dcoetzee>	If they change it, they have to license the changed version under CC-BY-SA 3.0 too.

[13:41]	<Glavkos>	there is no such obligation for WN?

	<Dcoetzee>	Right.

	<Glavkos>	ok
	great
	now I have an argument

	<Dcoetzee>	Unfortunately that means you can put Wikinews text on Wikipedia, but not put Wikipedia content on Wikinews.

	<Glavkos>	I know that already
[13:42]	I translated the guidelines for the Greek wiki

	<Dcoetzee>	Glavkos: Also, you should suggest to your members who are interested in releasing under CC-BY 3.0 that they can already do so with multilicensing.

	<Glavkos>	so any WN license is incompatible with SA ?

[13:43]	<Dcoetzee>	They can release under CC-BY 2.5 and CC-BY 3.0 both.

	<Glavkos>	ok
	but never a CC-BY-CA
	So , just a summary
	if we turn to 3.0
[13:44]	all the content will get multi licensed with both 2.5 and 3.0 cc-by
[13:45]	but SA is not acceptable ...

	<Dcoetzee>	No
	Your existing content is forever CC-BY-2.5. Its license cannot be changed.

	<Glavkos>	ok

	<Dcoetzee>	If you change to 3.0, your future content will be CC-BY-3.0.

[13:46]	<Glavkos>	ok
	I got it
	tell me now for SA

	<Dcoetzee>	And so your site will have a mixture of CC-BY-2.5 and CC-BY-3.0 content. People who use your content must follow both licenses.

[13:47]	<Glavkos>	but it is definite that we cann't turn to Share-Alike ....?
[13:48]	Dcoetzee: please answer to my last question ...

	<Dcoetzee>	For SA, you cannot include CC-BY-SA content on Wikinews, before or ever.

[13:49]	<Glavkos>	ok

	<Dcoetzee>	Nothing you can do can change that, besides throwing out all your content and starting over.

	<Glavkos>	no ...we do not want that ...
	nataly8: παρακολουθείς ;

[13:50]	<nataly8>	παρακολουθώ
	γράφω

	<Glavkos>	Dcoetzee: thank you very much
	You 've been very helpful

	<nataly8>	τι έγινε τελικά;

	<Glavkos>	nataly8: είπες ότι παρακολουθείς ..

[13:51]	<nataly8>	ναι, αλλά όχι όλο
	το τελευταίο μέρος δεν το κατάλαβα

	<Dcoetzee>	Np :-)
	Leave a message on User talk:Dcoetzee at enwiki if you want to follow up.
	<--|	Dcoetzee has left #wikinews-el