Βικινέα

Βικινέα:Ουδέτερη οπτική γωνία: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων

Περιήγηση ιστορικού διαδραστικά
← Παλαιότερη επεξεργασίαΝεότερη επεξεργασία →
Περιεχόμενο που διαγράφηκε Περιεχόμενο που προστέθηκε
ΟπτικήΚώδικας wiki
Γραμμή 52:
{{Μετάφραση}}
<!--
WeΜερικές sometimesφορές giveδίνουμε anμια alternativeεναλλακτική formulationδιατύπωση ofτης theπολιτικής non-biasτης policyαμεροληψίας: assertεπιβεβαιώστε factsτα γεγονότα, includingπεριλαμβανομένων factsκαι aboutτων γεγονότων σχετικά με γνώμες opinions--but don'tαλλά μην επιβεβαιώνετε τις assertίδιες opinionsτις themselvesγνώμες. By "fact," on the one hand, we mean "a piece of information about which there is no serious dispute." In this sense, that a survey produced a certain published result is a fact. That Mars is a planet is a fact. That Socrates was a philosopher is a fact. No one seriously disputes any of these things. So we can feel free to ''assert'' as many of them as we can. By "opinion," on the other hand, we mean "a piece of information about which there is some dispute." There's bound to be [[meta:borderline case|borderline cases]] where we're not sure if we should take a particular dispute seriously; but there are many propositions that very clearly express opinions. That the Beatles was the greatest band ever is an opinion. That the United States was wrong to drop the atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki is an opinion.
 
For determining whether something is fact or opinion in this sense, it does not matter what the actual truth of the matter is; there can at least in theory be "false facts" (things that ''everybody'' agrees upon, but which are, in fact, false).
Γραμμή 58:
Wikinews is devoted to stating facts and only facts. Where we might want to state opinions, we convert that opinion into a fact by ''attributing'' the opinion to someone. So, rather than asserting, "The Beatles was the greatest band", we can say, "Most Americans believe that the Beatles was the greatest band," which is a fact verifiable by survey results, or "The Beatles had many songs that made the Billboard Hot 100," which is also fact. In the first instance we assert an opinion; in the second and third instances we "convert" that opinion into fact by attributing it to someone. We realize that this does not ACTUALLY convert that opinion TO a fact, it just says it is a FACT that: "this person holds that opinion."
 
It's important to note this formulation is substantially different from the "some people believe..." formulation popular in political debates. The reference requires an identifiable and subjectively quantifiable population. -->
 
Παρουσιάζοντας μια γνώμη, επιπλέον, είναι σημαντικό να έχουμε υπόψη μας ότι υπάρχουν μερικές φορές διαφωνίες ακόμα για το ποιος είναι ο καλύτερος τρόπος για να παρουσιαστούν οι γνώμες. Μερικές φορές, θα είναι σημαντικό να επεξηγήσουμε την περιγραφή μιας γνώμης ή να την παρουσιάσουμε πολλαπλές διατυπώσεις, απλά για να φτάσουμε σε μια λύση που παρουσιάζει με δίκαιο τρόπο όλες τις εξέχουσες απόψεις για μια κατάσταση. Είναι γενικά σημαντικό να παρέχουμε τα γεγονότα σχετικά με τους λόγους που βρίσκονται πίσω από τις γνώμες, και να καθιστούμε σαφές ποιός τις πρεσβεύει. (Το καλύτερο συχνά είναι να παραθέτουμε έναν εξέχοντα εκπρόσωπο της άποψης.)
In presenting an opinion, moreover, it is important that we bear in mind that there are sometimes even disagreements about how opinions are best stated; sometimes, it will be necessary to qualify the description of an opinion or to present several formulations, simply to arrive at a solution that fairly represents all the leading views of the situation. It's generally important to give the facts about the reasons behind the views, and to make it clear who holds them. (It's often best to cite a prominent representative of the view.) -->
 
==Μια συνέπεια: γράφοντας για τον εχθρό==
Ανακτήθηκε από «https://el.wikinews.org/wiki/Βικινέα:Ουδέτερη_οπτική_γωνία»