Βικινέα:Ουδέτερη οπτική γωνία: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων

Περιεχόμενο που διαγράφηκε Περιεχόμενο που προστέθηκε
Γραμμή 51:
==Μια απλή διατύπωση==
{{Μετάφραση}}
Μερικές φορές δίνουμε μια εναλλακτική διατύπωση της πολιτικής της αμεροληψίας: επιβεβαιώστε τα γεγονότα, περιλαμβανομένων και των γεγονότων σχετικά με γνώμες -- αλλά μην επιβεβαιώνετε τις ίδιες τις γνώμες. ByΜε την λέξη "factγεγονός," onαπο theτην oneμια handπλευρά, we meanεννοούμε "aμια pieceπληροφορία ofγια informationτην aboutοποία which thereδεν isυπάρχει noσοβαρή serious disputeαμφισβήτηση." InΜε thisαυτή senseτην έννοια, thatότι aμια surveyέρευνα producedπου aπαράγει certainσυγκεκριμένο publishedδημοσιεύσιμο resultαποτέλεσμα isείναι aένα factγεγονός. ThatΌτι Marsο isΆρης aείναι planetένας isπλανήτης aείναι factγεγονός. ThatΌτι Socratesο wasΣωκράτης aήταν philosopherφιλόσοφος isείναι aκι factαυτό γεγονός. NoΚανένας oneδεν seriouslyαμφισβητεί disputesσοβαρά anyοποιοδήποτε ofαπ'αυτά theseτα thingsπράγματα. SoΈτσι μπορούμε weνα canνιώσουμε feelελεύθεροι freeνα to ''assertεπιβεβαιώσουμε'' asόσα manyαπ'αυτά ofμπορούμε. themΜε as we can.τον Byόρο "opinionγνώμη," onαπό theτην otherάλλη handπλευρά, weεννοούμε mean "a piece ofμια informationπληροφορία aboutγια whichτην thereοποία isυπάρχει someκάποια disputeαμφισβήτηση." <!--There's bound to be [[meta:borderline case|borderline cases]] where we're not sure if we should take a particular dispute seriously; but there are many propositions that very clearly express opinions. That the Beatles was the greatest band ever is an opinion. That the United States was wrong to drop the atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki is an opinion.
<!--
Μερικές φορές δίνουμε μια εναλλακτική διατύπωση της πολιτικής της αμεροληψίας: επιβεβαιώστε τα γεγονότα, περιλαμβανομένων και των γεγονότων σχετικά με γνώμες -- αλλά μην επιβεβαιώνετε τις ίδιες τις γνώμες. By "fact," on the one hand, we mean "a piece of information about which there is no serious dispute." In this sense, that a survey produced a certain published result is a fact. That Mars is a planet is a fact. That Socrates was a philosopher is a fact. No one seriously disputes any of these things. So we can feel free to ''assert'' as many of them as we can. By "opinion," on the other hand, we mean "a piece of information about which there is some dispute." There's bound to be [[meta:borderline case|borderline cases]] where we're not sure if we should take a particular dispute seriously; but there are many propositions that very clearly express opinions. That the Beatles was the greatest band ever is an opinion. That the United States was wrong to drop the atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki is an opinion.
 
ForΓια determiningνα whetherκαθορίσουμε somethingεάν isκάτι factείναι orγεγονός opinionή inγνώμη thisμε senseαυτήν την έννοια, it does not matter what the actual truth of the matter is; there can at least in theory be "false facts" (things that ''everybody'' agrees upon, but which are, in fact, false).
 
Wikinews is devoted to stating facts and only facts. Where we might want to state opinions, we convert that opinion into a fact by ''attributing'' the opinion to someone. So, rather than asserting, "The Beatles was the greatest band", we can say, "Most Americans believe that the Beatles was the greatest band," which is a fact verifiable by survey results, or "The Beatles had many songs that made the Billboard Hot 100," which is also fact. In the first instance we assert an opinion; in the second and third instances we "convert" that opinion into fact by attributing it to someone. We realize that this does not ACTUALLY convert that opinion TO a fact, it just says it is a FACT that: "this person holds that opinion."